Page 1 of 2
substantial Tits
Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2020 12:54 pm
by Runaway
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2020 1:06 pm
by Sir William
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 12:11 am
by Prizemaster
and Blue Tits, they matter too
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 12:22 am
by Runaway
Only in winter.
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2020 12:07 pm
by Sir William
Mr R*unaway - Why is not that slogan printed on the front of an amply-filled T-shirt?
Sort it out.
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2020 1:49 am
by Sir William
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2020 10:03 am
by Runaway
That costume must be ridiculously tight around her waist.
It's squeezed all her insides up into her chest.
Surely she'll burst.
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2020 1:06 pm
by Sir William
Oh - I hadn't noticed that.
I was just talking about the flag.
(The flag can be seen on the correct-hand side, near the top.)
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2020 12:42 am
by Runaway
Sir William wrote: ↑Sat Aug 22, 2020 1:06 pm
Oh - I hadn't noticed that.
An easy mistake to manufacture...
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2020 8:36 am
by Willy Nilly
This topic is promoting the se*ual objectification of wimmin
► Show Spoiler
More please!
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2020 1:21 pm
by Sir William
Women
ARE sex objects - whether they like it or not.
Although I was only promoting the se*ual objectification of substantial tits.
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2020 10:14 pm
by Runaway
I suppose if you consider them to be the destination / object of the sexual act, you may be correct.
But sex objects? I doubt that many females would agree... v2 doesn't...
► Show Spoiler
...even though she is very compliant...
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:11 pm
by Sir William
Runaway wrote: ↑Sun Aug 23, 2020 10:14 pm
But sex objects? I doubt that many females would agree... v2 doesn't...
Course they wouldn't. What do women know about sex?
In fact we're
all sex objects (some people more than others).
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 3:11 pm
by Sir William
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 11:27 pm
by Runaway
The real question is... are the things you're examining large enough?
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:43 pm
by Sir William
Judge for yourself:
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 8:50 pm
by Runaway
Since this is becoming** a dual nationality forum (English/Australian), shouldn't that flag be half-Australian?
** That should get-go a portion of a debate.
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2020 1:14 pm
by Sir William
But which half?
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2020 8:46 pm
by Runaway
The left half.
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2020 4:17 am
by Sir William
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2020 10:26 pm
by Runaway
I have a friend ... who has applied for permanent Australian citizenship.
Does the forum have enough spare cash to pay the fees?
After all, if
she my friend is happy, so would her partner be, and that would clearly enhance the forum enormously, for the benefit of all the amazing members, not only in this country but all around the world (thank you Nicholas Parsons), including the UK where you all unfortunately live.
You poor cold sods.
If forum funds are unavailable,
she my friend may need to ask the Chairman to sell part of his humongous estate to finance this amazing opportunity for the forum. After all, it's his duty as forum leader. You know it makes sense.
With privilege comes responsibility.
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:55 am
by Sir William
What does this have of to do with substantial tits?
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 12:18 pm
by Runaway
Nothing whatsoever. But I didn't want to waste a new topic on an expected refusal.
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:33 pm
by Sir William
Expected refusal?
Re: substantial Tits
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:53 pm
by Runaway